Breaking News

The Switch 2 announcement from Nintendo is expected before April 2025 English World Podcast: Episode 44 – Celebrating Global Accessibility Awareness Day Delaware County Ice Skaters Return Home from International Competition in France AI and Lasers Aid in Assessing Hurricane-Related Forest Damage Governor of Iowa signs literacy bill, emphasizes importance of ‘science of reading’

In this edition of TechLaw10, Attorney and Professor Eric Sinrod from California joins host Jonathan Armstrong to discuss the technology law aspects of AI. The conversation covers a range of topics, including conflicts between AI and GDPR, as well as the investigation and regulatory action taken against Clearview AI. Additionally, the Italian DPA’s activity against using AI in food delivery apps is highlighted.

Eric begins by discussing the impact of US privacy law on AI. He addresses issues surrounding AI and contracts, as well as torts, discussing who should bear liability in cases where something goes wrong. Furthermore, discrimination and bias in AI are explored in depth.

Jonathan then brings up conflicts between AI and GDPR, highlighting some of the challenges faced by companies operating within both frameworks. He also discusses the investigation and regulatory action taken against Clearview AI for its facial recognition technology.

The conversation then turns to Italy’s DPA activity against using AI in food delivery apps. This raises questions about how data protection laws can balance innovation with consumer privacy rights.

Listeners can access earlier TechLaw10 audio podcasts featuring Eric and Jonathan on www.techlaw10.com. To connect with the Compliance Podcast Network, they can visit their LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, and website platforms listed in the content.

Overall, this episode provides valuable insights into some of the legal challenges facing companies working with AI technologies today. It highlights how data protection laws can impact businesses while still protecting consumers’ rights to privacy.

Leave a Reply