Breaking News

Providence Health & Services reverses decision to terminate network agreement with Blue Shield of California Bloomberg New Economy: Orban’s Positioning of Hungary between China, Russia, and the West Marrakech set to host Kumho FIA TCR World Tour next Prominent Figure Exits NFL Network as Further Changes Unfold Exploring the Science of Malaria: A Quiz on its Unique Challenges

The US Department of Justice is conducting a criminal investigation into McKinsey consulting firm for its past advising of some of the largest opioid manufacturers in the nation. The probe centers around suspicions that the firm helped increase sales for these manufacturers by providing consulting services.

Federal prosecutors are looking into whether McKinsey or its employees obstructed legal proceedings related to its consulting services to opioid manufacturers. A grand jury has been empaneled in Virginia as part of the federal investigation, which is being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Western District of Virginia and the District of Massachusetts.

McKinsey has declined to comment on the investigation, but it’s clear that this criminal investigation is focusing on the consulting advice provided by McKinsey to drugmakers like Purdue, Endo International, and Mallinckrodt. These consulting services led to civil lawsuits against McKinsey in the past for its alleged role in exacerbating opioid addiction.

In recent years, McKinsey reached a settlement with all 50 states in the US, along with Washington, D.C., and five U.S. territories to pay $642 million without admitting wrongdoing for its role in the opioid crisis. The company also reached agreements totaling $347 million with public schools, insurance companies, and more. McKinsey has maintained that it was helping the legal use of opioids and patients with legitimate medical needs. However, this new criminal investigation may shed light on whether this was actually true or not.

The pharmaceutical companies that McKinsey advised have faced mass lawsuits for allegedly fueling addiction through deceptive marketing practices. For example, McKinsey’s recommendations to Purdue included strategies to increase OxyContin sales such as targeting high-volume prescribers and reducing time spent on low-volume prescribers.

McKinsey stopped working with opioid-specific businesses in 2019 but still maintains that their work for Purdue was aimed at supporting legal opioid use while advising Purdue and Endo on selling their products to the Department of Veterans Affairs though they claimed this work was separate from opioid-related issues.

Overall, McKinsey’s role in advising pharmaceutical companies on increasing opioid sales has come under scrutiny as part of the larger investigation into the opioid crisis in the United States.

The consequences of McKinsey’s actions have had far-reaching impacts on public health and

Leave a Reply