Breaking News

Pickard Park in Indianola welcomes top disc golf players for international tournament Global temperatures surpass 1.5C threshold for entire year Allocation of Rs 125 crore T20 World Cup prize money: Who receives what? The top health challenges women may encounter throughout their lives Earnings of Davis Thompson and the rest of the field at the John Deere Classic

This year’s Whitney Biennial left me feeling disappointed overall. While the theme of artificial intelligence and the exploration of gender and authenticity rhetoric was intriguing, it was difficult to distinguish between what was considered art versus something that resembled a human resources training video. However, despite my disappointment, I must acknowledge that the exhibition did succeed in one aspect – holding a mirror up to our society and economy, which is a fundamental purpose of art.

Despite its shortcomings, the Whitney Biennial served as a platform for artists to push boundaries and challenge societal norms. The exhibition seemed to play it safe this year, failing to captivate audiences and critics alike. The content was predictable and lacked risk-taking, which many found disappointing. Despite these criticisms, the biennial did succeed in sparking discussions about the current state of our society and economy, highlighting prevalent issues within elite institutions.

Leave a Reply