On Saturday, the House of Representatives approved a new aid package for Ukraine, despite opposition from the MAGA movement. The Biden Administration had been preparing to send the aid, awaiting authorization from Congress. The effects of this legislative achievement are expected to be rapid and significant.
Many observers are relieved, embarrassed, angry, and concerned about the situation in Ukraine. Relief comes from the fact that Ukraine is likely to receive aid to survive at least for a while amidst the overwhelming Russian artillery. Embarrassment stems from the closeness of the United States to betraying an endangered democracy. Anger is directed towards the political faction that blocked aid for months, seemingly in support of Vladimir Putin. Concern arises from the fact that this faction remains powerful and could continue to harm Ukraine.
Setting emotions aside, it’s important to analyze some myths surrounding aid to Ukraine. Contrary to belief, spending on Ukraine is not a huge burden on the United States nor does it bear this cost alone without support from European allies. American aid remains crucial as Europe can provide money but lacks sufficient military hardware to support Ukraine adequately.
Comparing aid to Ukraine with historical parallels such as Franklin Roosevelt’s Lend-Lease program reveals that current aid is much smaller relative to the size of the US economy. However, it is essential to note that while relief is felt that aid has been approved, concerns remain about its future sustainability as American support remains crucial for its survival.
