On Thursday, 15-seed Princeton males pulled out a thrilling upset more than No. two Arizona.
The Tigers, who will advance to the Round of 32 on Saturday, are the only group in the men’s tournament devoid of any players on athletic scholarship. Ivy League schools prohibit sports scholarships and only provide athletes “need-based” economic help.
As if March couldn’t get any madder, two basketball players filed a lawsuit against Ivy League schools more than this policy just two weeks ago.
- The lawsuit, which is in search of class certification, was filed by present Brown women’s basketball player Grace Kirk and former men’s player Tamenang Choh.
- The players argued in a complaint that the policy violates the Sherman Antitrust Act by illegally cost-fixing the worth of athletes’ athletic competitors.
- Though the suit acknowledges that players acquire economic help, it frequently does not cover the expense of attendance — which an athletic scholarship could.
“The Ivy League Agreement, in brief, has stymied competitors that would have lowered, and would reduce, the net expense of attendance,” the complaint study. “These injuries are especially unfair provided what is essential of Ivy League Athletes and how their solutions advantage their schools and the Ivy League brand.”
The complaint also referenced two other current antitrust instances connected to college sports, O’Bannon v. NCAA and NCAA v. Alston — which each located that specific compensation restrictions in the NCAA have been illegal.
“The Ivy League athletics model is constructed upon the foundational principle that student-athletes should really be representative of the wider student physique, such as the chance to acquire will need-primarily based economic help,” the Ivy League mentioned in a statement.
