A draft of the Casa Decree, a proposed solution to Italy’s housing crisis, is expected to be discussed in the Council of Ministers. The decree aims to address building discrepancies and promote the recovery of existing building stock while reducing land consumption. The explanatory report of the decree emphasizes the importance of removing obstacles that hinder property sales due to formal irregularities.
The decree includes several provisions aimed at simplifying processes for homeowners and providing relief from bureaucratic constraints. For example, structures created during the Covid emergency for “health, welfare, and educational” purposes can remain operational beyond the initial time constraint as long as there are proven and objective needs supporting their ongoing necessity. Additionally, changes to the intended use of a property can be made without requiring construction work, as long as it complies with sector regulations and municipal planning guidelines.
Enforcement of the decree will fall to municipalities, who will have authority to arrange for the sale of properties with illegal structures. The value of these properties will be determined by a territory agency, taking into account costs associated with removing illegal works. This provision aims to provide relief for homeowners dealing with minor irregularities in their properties while also addressing major issues related to illegal building practices.
Despite its intentions to streamline processes and address housing needs, opposition parties have raised concerns about the Casa Decree. Some have labeled it an “amnesty” for building violations, arguing that it is too lenient on developers who break regulations. Supporters argue that this is necessary simplification to address minor irregularities that many homeowners face while critics remain wary of potential unintended consequences.
In conclusion, the Casa Decree reflects Italy’s evolving real estate landscape and balancing housing needs, regulatory compliance, and property rights. While some may see it as an amnesty for building violations, others view it as necessary simplification aimed at addressing minor irregularities faced by many homeowners while ensuring compliance with regulations and municipal planning guidelines.
