The recent actions of Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa in forcibly removing former Vice President Jorge Glas from the Mexican embassy in Quito have been met with international condemnation. Noboa’s actions were seen as a violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which protects the inviolability of embassies and the right to asylum. Despite this, a majority of Ecuadorians supported the assault on the embassy, viewing it as an act of justice.
Those who disapproved of the assault expressed concerns about Ecuador’s reputation, violations of international law, and potential conflicts within the country. Political analyst Paulina Recalde highlighted the impact of the assault on Ecuador’s image internationally. The defense of the assault by the majority of Ecuadorians reflects their disillusionment with the rule of law and democracy in the country.
Ecuador has a long history of political instability, corruption, and distrust in institutions. Recent events, including the assault on the embassy and ongoing political crises, have further eroded public trust in the government. These factors have contributed to a preference for strong leadership over adherence to international law and democratic principles.
Despite his declining popularity, President Noboa continues to govern with military support. Ecuadorians’ lack of confidence in democratic institutions and their willingness to justify a military coup in cases of corruption highlight the challenges facing the country. The military’s role in maintaining order during times of crisis has fueled perceptions that it represents the interests of the people.
Ecuador’s complex political landscape, characterized by corruption, impunity, and institutional dysfunction, has created a climate of instability and discontent among its population. The assault on the Mexican embassy and broader political context underscored these challenges facing Ecuador as it navigates ongoing crises while striving to build a more stable and democratic society.
The situation in Ecuador is volatile due to its history of political instability coupled with current events such as protests against President Noboa’s policies which have led to violence resulting from police crackdowns on demonstrators.
The government’s response to these issues has been criticized by many as heavy-handed and authoritarian while some see it as necessary for maintaining order during turbulent times.
In conclusion, despite efforts by international community to condemn his actions President Noboa remains unapologetic about his decision to remove Vice President Glas from Mexico’s embassy citing national security concerns but this move has further strained relations between nations leading some countries to consider withdrawing their ambassadors from Quito.
It is clear that Ecuador’s political landscape remains complex with multiple factions vying for power while also grappling with deep-seated issues such as corruption and impunity within institutions making it challenging for any leader or regime to gain sustained support among its citizens or other nations alike.
